Assessment of utero-cervical angle and cervical length as predictors for threatened preterm delivery in singleton pregnancies.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between the cervix and the threat of preterm labor in singleton pregnancies between gestational weeks less than 37 and greater than 37 weeks in correlation with utero-cervical angle (UCA) and cervical length (CL) measurements. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a prospective cohort study with UCA and CL measurements in patients with threatened preterm labor (TPL). Primary outcome was differences in UCA and CL measurements in relationship to maternal characteristics and perinatal outcome between groups. Secondary outcome evaluated measurement results and influencing factors for delivery within 7 days, between 1 and 4 weeks and beyond 4 weeks. RESULTS: Overall 152 patients were divided into as study/preterm group (<37 weeks; n = 56) and the control/term group (≥37 weeks; n = 96). Mean gestational age at admission was similar in both groups (30.98 ± 2.83 vs. 30.36 ± 2.63 weeks, p = 0.149) with similar CL (33.9 ± 6.34 vs. 32.02 ± 8.88 mm, p = 0.132), but wider UCA in the preterm group (81.65 ± 16.81° vs. 99.21 ± 22.33°, p < 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis for preterm delivery was significant for nulliparity and UCA measurement. The factor for delivering before 37 gestational weeks within 7 days was the gestational week at admission (p = 0.046). UCA and CL measurements were statistically significant for distinguishing patients for delivery within 7 days and beyond 4 weeks (p = 0.001 for CL and p = 0.0001 for UCA). NPV was found 92.5, 92.2, and 92.3 for UCA >105°, CL ≤30 mm, and Bishop score >3, respectively. CONCLUSION: Combined measurement of TV UCA and CL represents stronger predictors for sPTB ultrasonographically, demonstrating the uterocervical sub-segment maturation before the active onset of labor.

The influence of the systematic birth preparation program on childbirth satisfaction.

PURPOSE: The primary purpose of this study was to assess the influence of a systematic multidisciplinary birth preparation program on satisfaction with childbirth experience. A secondary aim was to detect factors that affect the childbirth satisfaction. METHODS: In this prospective study, 77 pregnant women who completed the 4-month birth preparation program (Group 1) and 75 women in the control group (Group 2) were asked to fill out two questionnaires with face-to-face interviews within 48 h after labor. One of the questionnaires was the translated form of Salmon's Item List German (SIL-Ger), and SIL-Ger scores ≥70 was accepted as a satisfactory experience. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of sociocultural and intrapartum characteristics, and obstetric outcome parameters. The women who received antenatal education experienced significantly less pain (p = 0.01), had a better communication with midwife or obstetrician during delivery (p = 0.001), and participated more actively in decision-making before, during, and after childbirth (p < 0.001 for all). SIL score was significantly higher in Group 1 (105.7 ± 2.2 vs 80 ± 2.5, p < 0.01), and significantly more women had a SIL score ≥70 (96.1 vs 73.3%, p < 0.01). In multivariate logistic regression model, attending the birth preparation program and the level of pain perceived during labor were found to have a significant effect on the birth satisfaction. CONCLUSION: Systematic birth preparation program improves satisfaction with childbirth experience by enabling women to communicate better with healthcare providers and to participate in decision-making during labor, as well as by decreasing the perception of labor pain.